[Seite: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ]
| 13.03.2015 18:28:43 | Re: Turniere 2015 |
Downburst Posts:182 | ich steige wieder ein ins geschehen. das turnier geht länger als gedacht und die lags sind nicht mehr ganz so schlimm |
| 25.03.2015 14:46:44 | Re: Turniere 2015 |
Jochen Posts:135 | new deadline is 29.03.15 Too bad that so much matches don't played... |
| 25.03.2015 18:35:41 | Re: Turniere 2015 |
Saver Posts:31 | I think it must be standings without the results with b3ast, thox, lom and trivnot |
| 25.03.2015 19:16:57 | Re: Turniere 2015 |
Shades Posts:399 | Zitat von Saver: I think it must be standings without the results with b3ast, thox, lom and trivnot We can it do like in the last year see http://www.blobby-liga.de/blobby-thread.php?ID=760 we gave the DSQ a def loos (0:30 loose for a not played game for the DSQ) |
| 25.03.2015 19:28:56 | Re: Turniere 2015 |
walter98 Posts:27 | Zitat von Shades: Zitat von Saver: I think it must be standings without the results with b3ast, thox, lom and trivnot We can it do like in the last year see http://www.blobby-liga.de/blobby-thread.php?ID=760 we gave the DSQ a def loos (0:30 loose for a not played game for the DSQ) Yes i think this is senseful  |
| 25.03.2015 19:55:54 | Re: Turniere 2015 |
Saver Posts:31 | 30-0 againts all players? or againts those with them they still not played? In first case it is the same as we delete the results againts non-playing players... in the second case it is unfair to players who played yet againts them...because other players will have better results without real playing |
| 25.03.2015 20:42:31 | Re: Turniere 2015 |
Shades Posts:399 | Zitat von Saver: 30-0 againts all players? or againts those with them they still not played? In first case it is the same as we delete the results againts non-playing players... in the second case it is unfair to players who played yet againts them...because other players will have better results without real playing yes but we can make this way as a inofficial way if all players in the list 30-0 only vs. player they still not played I mean that we make it how in the las Year Saver you know? |
| 26.03.2015 10:48:43 | Re: Turniere 2015 |
Saver Posts:31 | This is another turnier with another organizators with another rules.... Is we will write 30-0 and count them as 30-0 we mut do it for all matches of this player...and disqualified him... another way it will be unfair...do you need an example? It such trouble to delete the results of diqualified players and the matches againts them??? Dieser Post wurde zuletzt am 26.03.2015 um 12:18:25 editiert |
| 26.03.2015 13:01:31 | Re: Turniere 2015 |
Jochen Posts:135 | So what is the problem? All matches will be played till sunday. Excerpt thox, lom, Trivnot and b3ast. Than there will be an official ranking with all excerpt this 4 player and an inofficial like the last year. |
| 01.04.2015 22:37:59 | Re: Turniere 2015 |
Jochen Posts:135 | Ranking (without b3ast, lom, thox, Trivnot and GK) 26 Shades, Saver, Downburst 24 Cumparablex 18 mahmud 15 Jochen 10 walter98 09 Vlansch 05 forest 02 viki_88 01 seb199 seb199 vs. forest as def-los So what's with the first places?? There wasn't clear rules: a2) Saver said the direct relation from the direct match counts (Saver, Downburst, Shades) c) But a look at the difference: Downburst (176), Shades (145), Saver (145) b) look at only own points: Shades: (285) Saver (283) [a) Downburst (30), Saver (27), Shades (24)] What do you think?? I really don't no. Should this player plays again? Edit: 1st: Saver 2nd: Downburst 3rd: Shades Dieser Post wurde zuletzt am 01.04.2015 um 23:09:35 editiert |
[Seite: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ]
Du musst angemeldet und eingeloggt sein um Antworten zu schreiben
